Right here, right now is where we draw the line.

就在这里，就是现在，最后的通牒。

" We've always known where to draw the line, " said Fred.

“我们一直很明白要在哪里画个界线。”乔治说。

No, better draw the line, I don't think it's necessary.

不，最好就到这里了，我觉得没必要。

Where would you draw the line between an Israeli state and a Palestinian state?

在以色列和巴勒斯坦之间，要怎么划清界？

You know that is actually causing all of these natural disasters, so it is difficult to actually determine where to draw the line between natural and man-made disasters.

而它实际上正在引发所有的这些自然灾害，所以很难真正在自然和人为灾害之间划出界线。

So it's so important to know when to draw the line and walk away.

因此，知道什么时候该划清界然后走开就非常重要。

We catch the lie, draw the line and set the boundary.

我们看穿谎言，划清界线，设定边界。

It draws the line at two-and-a half times the WHO limit.

们把该值定在WHO值的2.5倍。

The trouble, for most people, is where to draw the line, or rather several.

对大多数人来说，问题是在哪里划清那条界，或者更确切地说，是好几条界。

The question is, how do you draw the line?

问题在于，分界线在哪里?

The problem lies in deciding where to draw the line.

问题在于如何决定该在哪里划下界线。

It was our responsibility to draw the line.

我们有责任划定界。

Cam, maybe grabbing a kid's arm is where we draw the line.

卡姆，抓小孩的手臂应该是属于禁止事项吧。

It deems incorrect by 80 percent, but it’s not easy to draw the line.

百分之八十是不正确的，但要划清界并不容易。

That's it. That's where I draw the line.

到此为止，这是我的底线。

Well, at least I draw the line at sleeping with dogs.

至少我不会和狗上床。

Drawing the line can be surprisingly difficult.

划清界可能会非常困难。

If everybody starts identifying themselves as having ADHD, you know, if like 10% becomes 20%, becomes 30 becomes 50, becomes 60%, then really what is the disorder that we're talking about here where are we drawing the line.

如果每个人都开始认定自己有多动症，你知道的，如果像10%变成20%，变成30%，变成50%，变成60%，那么真正的障碍是什么，我们谈论的是我们该在哪里划定患多动症的界。

Orson, every wife understands that her husband will make a few mistakes, a forgotten anniversary, the occasional harsh word, but we all have to draw the line somewhere, and I'm drawing mine at the attempted murder of my best friend's husband.

奥森，每个妻子都可以理解，她的丈夫会犯点小错误，偶尔忘记结婚纪念日，或是不小心说错话，但是我们得有底线，我的底线是至少我丈夫不能，试图谋杀我最要好的朋友的老公。

Instead of simply pushing his worldview over Treadwell's, however, Herzog uses their disagreement to spark a broader discussion on the boundaries between Man and nature, where do we draw the line between human idealism and objective fact?

然而，赫尔佐格并没有简单地将自己的世界观强加于特雷德威尔之上，而是利用们的分歧引发了一场关于人与自然之间界的更广泛讨论，我们在哪里划定人类理想主义与客观事实之间的界？